O! So naive the philosophers of the past, not to forgot the present; So frustrated by the naive in Earth’s Paradise, yet to their greatest torment, the cost of wisdom, the burden lays heavy in the philosophers mind. How long may they carry this frustration? How naive of the ‘wise’ and ‘enlightened’ those who swore they ‘saw’, those who ‘see’ it all. How naive of them to condemn the naive… I am the one who love them the most.
This concept of ‘intelligence’ perhaps is not properly evolved. How exactly are you ‘intelligent’? You got high education? Mere ‘Good’ education was achieved over many years, and small disruptions in envoriments put the whole ‘intelligence’ at the face of existential terror. A whole ‘field’ of knowledge, made irrevelant nearly overnight, and suddently the ‘intelligent’ became the fool.
This of course not to mean one should not seek knowledge. The issue of intelligence is that one need more that a singular pattern to recognize, majority of existence have complex interconnected webs of patterns. Each field specialize in a singular, and they are kept apart, bloated with empty fluff: such as moral and emotional appeals to apease those life is too ‘harsh’ for.
I do wonder, what makes you think you are ‘wise’ and ‘intelligent’? We might even think we sound ‘intelligent’ while we are percieved as stupid, often at the same time that we percieve the person we self speak to as stupid, they percieve us as the fool.
The question, however is not: “How to become wise?” rather the question should be: “What is?” As what is the appeal? For example “Might makes Right” the most common claim is that “Strength dictates moral right.” But this is quite stupid, if we look at to what ‘right’ actually mean. ‘Right’ is simple as 1+1=2 so if 1+1=2 is ‘right’ then what is ‘Right’ ‘IS’. Then we need to figure out what the appeal actually is. Moral, Emotional or Logical?
Most of human appeals will sway towards ‘Moral’ and ‘Emotional’ appeals, not daring to show their ‘Shadow’, too afraid to be condemned, yet they live in a lie, while claiming to be ‘genuine’ such a tragic end. Perhaps we ‘real’ philosophers don’t need the crutches such as the philosophers of the past and present. Too logical and Powerful for our own good. Who’s to go into insanity and madness first? And who of us will escape.. Alive?